Remember that whole "Global Warming" thing...

You guys remember this one, right?  The junk science hoax that CO2 and burning of fossil fuels was destroying the environnment and causing the planet to heat up.  You remember that nonsence.

This is not a new concept.  The same greenie-weenies were beating this dead horse in the 60's and 70's only then they were preaching global cooling.  Recently, Al "planet-has-a-fever" Gore brought this charade to the fore front in 2004 with his "crock-umentary" The Inconvenient Truth.  Well, it had its 15 minutes of fame until people started to ask questions and apply real science to this idea.

For instance:

How can the same thing (CO2) be responsible for supposed cooling 50 years ago by blocking sunlight n the atmosphere, yet be responsible for heating today by destroying it?

If Global Warming exists, why is the average global temperature cooler now than it was 10 years ago?

And the latest...they are saying that while the CO2 output of the US is heating the planet, the new CO2 output of China and India is cooling it at the same time....how does that work?

The enviro-fascists realized people were getting wise so they used the time-honored liberal past time of re-naming the hoax.  We have changed from Global Warming to "Climate Change" when they realized the planet was getting colder.

Anyway...I really don't want this particular post to be a full attack on Global Warming.  However, that post may come later.  What I have been trying to lead up to is a news story that came out yesterday.  Remember how in 2004 it was a study of polar bears that became the rallying point for all the sheep that bought into this sham?  The study proposed tat polar bears were in danger from the melting ice caused by global warming.  Well, the first crack in that study came when a count was taken of the polar bear population and found that it was, in fact, increasing!.  The latest, and hopeful final, blow to this study is that the federal scientist who made that report, Charles Monnett, has been put on adminstrative leave and is facing charges of "scientific misconduct" in regards to his article about the polar bears.

Remember the days when scientists changed their theories the fit the collected data instead of the other way around?  Those were some great times...